Bet Sizing
When it comes to betting
on football games there are many systems out there. The most popular systems
seem to follow the same basic idea. It goes along the idea of raising your bets
when you’re winning and lowering them when you’re losing. That way you take
full advantage of winning steaks and don’t get hurt on losing steaks. The
reasoning behind this seems logical enough. That certainly sounds like good
advice, but is it? It’s very bad advice actually. Before we get into the nuts
and bolts of it, I have a simple question. How in the world does someone know
they’re in the middle of a winning streak? And if they know that they’re in the
middle of a steak, why wouldn’t they bet everything they have on the next game?
After all, they would know they’re going to win the next game, because being in
the middle of a winning streak means just that. The advice is silly on its
face. As it turns out, that piece of advice has hurt far more gamblers than
it’s helped. Raising and lowering your bet sizes actually makes it harder for
you to win. Here’s an example. Take any series of 10 bets with 5 wins and 5
losses. If you bet the same amount on every game, you’re going to break even,
no surprise there. Now let’s look at a sequence of bets, raising and lowering after
a win or loss. It doesn’t matter what the order is for these 5 wins and 5
losses. I’ll do two below. The one on the left is 5 wins followed by 5 losses.
On the right, 5 losses followed by 5 winning bets. The bet size will be 10% of
the total bankroll after the last bet. The bankroll stars out at $1000.
Bet size
|
Bankroll
|
Bet size
|
Bankroll
|
|||
1000
|
1000
|
|||||
win
|
100
|
1100
|
loss
|
100
|
900
|
|
win
|
110
|
1210
|
loss
|
90
|
810
|
|
win
|
121
|
1331
|
loss
|
81
|
729
|
|
win
|
133
|
1464
|
loss
|
73
|
656
|
|
win
|
146
|
1610
|
loss
|
66
|
590
|
|
loss
|
161
|
1449
|
win
|
59
|
649
|
|
loss
|
145
|
1304
|
win
|
65
|
714
|
|
loss
|
130
|
1174
|
win
|
71
|
785
|
|
loss
|
117
|
1057
|
win
|
79
|
864
|
|
loss
|
106
|
951
|
win
|
86
|
950
|
The first thing we
notice is that both sequences end up losing money. Remember, when you bet the
same amount on each game you start with $1000 and after 5 wins and 5 losses you
still have $1000. When you change bet sizes, you end up with about $950. You’ve
lost about $50 in both examples, picking the same games at the same win rate,
50%. The wins and losses can be in any order. As long as there are 5 wins and 5
losses the results will be the same, minus about $50. The second thing to
notice is that when you juggle the bet sizes, you have to win at a higher
percentage rate to make money. Where 50% was break even, when varying bet sizes
it’s a higher number.
Notice that we didn’t
account for the vig in these examples. There’s no doubt about it, raising and
lowering your bet sizes makes it harder for you win money.
This doesn’t mean to
never raise your bet or lower it. If you use a bankroll, my advice is to only
change your bet size at the beginning of the season and keep it at that level
for the whole season. If you don’t use a
bankroll, and you should, you should never change your bet size during a season.
Most gamblers don’t
understand this concept and consequently make it harder on themselves to win.
Don’t fall into this trap!
No comments:
Post a Comment